Just Because it’s Cool…
(Doesn’t mean you should do it.)
I love fireworks, and, I’ll admit, this love has persuaded my better conscience into lighting them off in some dangerous situations. Having a lighter in one hand and a small-scale explosive in the other evokes a powerful feeling, a feeling enhanced by the inevitable drunkenness that inspired you to choose such a combination in the first place. But what a rush those cascading colors are!
As the US prepares to shoot down one of its wayward orbiters on thursday, a few notable onlookers are voicing their vexation. Russia, for instance, has said that,
There is an impression that the United States is trying to use the accident with its satellite to test its national anti-missile defence system’s capability to destroy other countries’ satellites.
There is an impression? What manner of fantastic thinking could lead one to such a verdict? They’re saving us from a rogue flying-machine hellbent on dousing the globe with ‘toxic fuel.’ Demonstrating to the world that America is capable of destroying ‘other countries’ satellites’ is a mere byproduct of this otherwise humanitarian mission.
What type of firework is this exactly? The impartials at the Washington Post:
The three-stage Navy missile, designated the SM-3, has chalked up a high rate of success in a series of tests since 2002, in each case targeting a short- or medium-range ballistic missile, [but] never a satellite. A hurry-up program to adapt the missile for this anti-satellite mission was completed in a matter of weeks.
That such an adaptation of the defensive weapon took weeks to accomplish is testament to its makers innocent intentions. Moreover, Navy officials went out of their way to assure anyone with (obviously irrational) fears that “changes will be reversed once this satellite is down.” I mean, once they’ve said that…
Russia is one thing, but China is really grasping at straws here. A ’specialist’ at a Beijing university - and this is some communist logic - has said that,
In my opinion, this decision is imprudent and ill advised…If this satellite is shot down, the toxic fuel will still be there. Therefore, the pollution still exists.
Sound logic, on the surface, although where the toxic fuel exists will not be the earth’s surface, but space. Of course, the US’ move will effectively prevent sensitive technologies from falling into the wrong hands, but, again, this is a byproduct of the humanitarian object of the operation. China itself conducted their own humanitarian ground-to-space dismissal of a weather satellite last year - you can’t have some weirded-out earth circler predicting off forecasts, after all. China, get a grip. You know the score.
I’m not suggesting that the US is the global version of a drunken kid with a bic and a Roman Candle (who in that scenario loses the thumb?), but they sure know how to spice up the party. The economy is hurtin’, the debt is growing, and we’re runnin’ out of booze. Ugh - fireworks!


So much so, in fact, that there are now plans for 